Round A (week 4, 5)

Round A1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

ARIF KHALID Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

Chang Si Kai Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

DOMINIC BERZIN CHUA WAY GIN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

XENOS FIORENZO ANONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ZHU YUANXI Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

Round A2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

Li Zhaoqi Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

NGUYEN KHOI NGUYEN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

Lee Hyung Woon Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

JONAS ONG SI WEI Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

POON YIP HANG, RYAN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

Qiu Jiasheng, Jason Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

 

Round B (week 7, 8)

Round B1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

Chang Si Kai Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

DOMINIC BERZIN CHUA WAY GIN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

XENOS FIORENZO ANONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ZHU YUANXI Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ARIF KHALID Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

Round B2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

Lee Hyung Woon Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

JONAS ONG SI WEI Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

POON YIP HANG, RYAN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

Qiu Jiasheng, Jason Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

Li Zhaoqi Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

NGUYEN KHOI NGUYEN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

 

Round C (week 11, 12)

Round C1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

DOMINIC BERZIN CHUA WAY GIN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

XENOS FIORENZO ANONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

ZHU YUANXI Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

ARIF KHALID Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

Chang Si Kai Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

 

Round C2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

Qiu Jiasheng, Jason Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

Li Zhaoqi Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

NGUYEN KHOI NGUYEN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

Lee Hyung Woon Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

JONAS ONG SI WEI Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

POON YIP HANG, RYAN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments: