Round A (week 3, 4, 5)

Round A1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

GOH YEE CHONG, GABRIEL Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

LEE XIONG JIE, ISAAC Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

CHAN YU CHENG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ELTON GOH JUN HAO Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

JAY ALJELO SAEZ TING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

MOK KHENG SHENG FERGUS Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

SIM SING YEE, EUNICE Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

Round A2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

WONG CHEE HONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

GOKUL RAJIV Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

MARCUS TANG XIN KYE Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

CHANG WENG YEW, NICOLAS Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

DOMINIC LIM KAI JUN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

NEO WEI QING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ZHANG ZIQING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

Round A3

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

VIGNESH SANKAR IYER Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

HANNAH CHIA KAI XIN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

LEE WEI, DAVID Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

CHARISMA KAUSAR Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

DAVID GARETH ONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

KEVIN FOONG WEI TONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ONG JUN HENG, CEDRIC Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

 

Round B (week 7, 8, 9)

Round B1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

CHAN YU CHENG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ELTON GOH JUN HAO Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

MARCUS TANG XIN KYE Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

JAY ALJELO SAEZ TING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

MOK KHENG SHENG FERGUS Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

GOH YEE CHONG, GABRIEL Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

LEE XIONG JIE, ISAAC Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

Round B2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

GOKUL RAJIV Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

CHANG WENG YEW, NICOLAS Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

DOMINIC LIM KAI JUN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

NEO WEI QING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

SIM SING YEE, EUNICE Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ZHANG ZIQING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

WONG CHEE HONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

Round B3

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

HANNAH CHIA KAI XIN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

LEE WEI, DAVID Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

CHARISMA KAUSAR Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

DAVID GARETH ONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

KEVIN FOONG WEI TONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ONG JUN HENG, CEDRIC Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

VIGNESH SANKAR IYER Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

 

Round C (week 12, 13)

Round C1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

DOMINIC LIM KAI JUN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

JAY ALJELO SAEZ TING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

MOK KHENG SHENG FERGUS Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

NEO WEI QING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

SIM SING YEE, EUNICE Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

GOH YEE CHONG, GABRIEL Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

LEE XIONG JIE, ISAAC Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

CHAN YU CHENG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

ELTON GOH JUN HAO Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

GOKUL RAJIV Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

MARCUS TANG XIN KYE Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

 

Round C2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

CHANG WENG YEW, NICOLAS Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

KEVIN FOONG WEI TONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

ONG JUN HENG, CEDRIC Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

ZHANG ZIQING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

VIGNESH SANKAR IYER Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

WONG CHEE HONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

HANNAH CHIA KAI XIN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

LEE WEI, DAVID Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

CHARISMA KAUSAR Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments:

DAVID GARETH ONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
| Comments: