Round A (week 3, 5)

Round A1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

LOW JUN KAI, SEAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

DING YUCHEN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

CHAN GER HEAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

TAN CHEE PENG [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

LI JIANHAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

 

Round A2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

RYO CHANDRA PUTRA ARMANDA [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

JONAH TAN JUN ZI [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

HSU ZHONG JUN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

MO ZONGRAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

LIM ZI WEI [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

 

 

Round B (week 7, 8)

Round B1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

DING YUCHEN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

RYO CHANDRA PUTRA ARMANDA [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

HSU ZHONG JUN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

CHAN GER HEAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

MO ZONGRAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

 

Round B2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

LOW JUN KAI, SEAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

JONAH TAN JUN ZI [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

TAN CHEE PENG [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

LIM ZI WEI [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

LI JIANHAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA
Comments:

 

 

Round C (week 11, 12)

Round C1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

DING YUCHEN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc.
Comments:

RYO CHANDRA PUTRA ARMANDA [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc.
Comments:

HSU ZHONG JUN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc.
Comments:

CHAN GER HEAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc.
Comments:

MO ZONGRAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc.
Comments:

 

Round C2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

LOW JUN KAI, SEAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc.
Comments:

JONAH TAN JUN ZI [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc.
Comments:

TAN CHEE PENG [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc.
Comments:

LIM ZI WEI [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc.
Comments:

LI JIANHAN [Topic: Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5]

slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc.
Comments: