Round A (week 4, 5)

Round A1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

Lee Chun Wei Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

LIU YONGLIANG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

HUANG CHENGYU Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

TAY YI HSUEN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

Zhou Jiahao Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

DAO NGOC HIEU Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ZHAO JINGJING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

Round A2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

KANG SU MIN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

KOH RAYSON Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ONG JUN XIONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

Jovyn Tan Li Shyan Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

CHAN JUN DA Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

FANG JUNWEI, SAMUEL Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

WU QIRUI Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

 

Round B (week 7, 8)

Round B1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

Lee Chun Wei Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

LIU YONGLIANG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

HUANG CHENGYU Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

TAY YI HSUEN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

Zhou Jiahao Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

DAO NGOC HIEU Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ZHAO JINGJING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

Round B2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

KANG SU MIN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

KOH RAYSON Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ONG JUN XIONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

Jovyn Tan Li Shyan Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

CHAN JUN DA Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

FANG JUNWEI, SAMUEL Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

WU QIRUI Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
started with PUNCH | gave WIIFY | gave roadmap | key points clear | ended with key points and CtA | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

 

Round C (week 11, 12 10, 11)

Round C1

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

KANG SU MIN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

LIU YONGLIANG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ONG JUN XIONG Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

HUANG CHENGYU Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

TAY YI HSUEN Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

DAO NGOC HIEU Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

ZHAO JINGJING Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

 

Round C2

 

Delivery: 1 very bad | 3 average | 5 very good
Usefulness to YOU: 1 not useful at all | 3 >25% of the talk useful | 5 >75% of the talk useful

Lee Chun Wei Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

KOH RAYSON Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

Jovyn Tan Li Shyan Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

CHAN JUN DA Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

Zhou Jiahao Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

FANG JUNWEI, SAMUEL Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.

WU QIRUI Delivery: 1 2 3 4 5 | Usefulness: 1 2 3 4 5
slides visual-enough | no visual clutter | key slides stand out | assertion-evidence style used (if applicable) | no excessive jargons meaningful animations | demo not too late | PUNCH, WIIFY, Roadmap, Key Points, Last Slide etc. | Comments:
.
.
.
.
.